Abstract

Short Communication

How to avoid partial implantation of people with cochlear malformation

Bouafif Lamia and Cherif Adnen*

Published: 14 November, 2022 | Volume 6 - Issue 1 | Pages: 036-037

Many advances have been made in recent years in the development of hearing and cochlear implants. These use acoustic and electrical stimulation technologies to improve speech intelligibility for the hearing impaired. However, for cochlear prostheses, the results are not very promising and vary from one patient to another. Certain technical and sometimes physiological problems have limited the expected performances of these devices, especially for children and the elderly. These problems include cochlear malformation and ossification of the auditory channels. This led us to reduce the number of electrodes in order to allow quality deep insertion while preserving the low-frequency acoustic bands of the operated patient.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.acst.1001031 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

References

  1. Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 May-Jun;9(3):163-72. doi: 10.1159/000077267. PMID: 15084821.
  2. O'Connell BP, Hunter JB, Haynes DS, Holder JT, Dedmon MM, Noble JH, Dawant BM, Wanna GB. Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes. Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2352-2357. doi: 10.1002/lary.26467. Epub 2017 Mar 17. PMID: 28304096; PMCID: PMC5825186.
  3. Dorman MF, Loizou PC. The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels. Ear Hear. 1998 Apr;19(2):162-6. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199804000-00008. PMID: 9562538.
  4. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Pfenningdorff T, Hartmann R, Stürzebecher E, Klinke R. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1999 Nov-Dec;61(6):334-40. doi: 10.1159/000027695. PMID: 10545807.
  5. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Polak M, Driscoll CL, Roland P, Buchman CA. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):413-25. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827e8163. PMID: 23446225; PMCID: PMC3742689.
  6. Vaerenberg B, Péan V, Lesbros G, De Ceulaer G, Schauwers K, Daemers K, Gnansia D, Govaerts PJ. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Jun;14(3):150-7. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000008. PMID: 23321588.
  7. Bouafif L. Electro-acoustic coding and stimulation strategies. Bookchapter. Noor publishing Editions, Germany. 2016;2-96.
  8. Croghan NBH, Duran SI, Smith ZM. Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Dec;142(6):EL537. doi: 10.1121/1.5016044. Erratum in: J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 May;143(5):2621. PMID: 29289062.

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

  • Management and Therapeutic Strategies for Spinal Muscular Atrophy
    Sheena P Kochumon and Cherupally Krishnan Krishnan Nair* Sheena P Kochumon, Cherupally Krishnan Krishnan Nair*. Management and Therapeutic Strategies for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. J Genet Med Gene Ther. 2024: doi: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001009; 7: 001-007
  • A Critical Review on Some Recent Developments in Comparison of Biological Sequences
    DK Bhattacharya* DK Bhattacharya*. A Critical Review on Some Recent Developments in Comparison of Biological Sequences. J Genet Med Gene Ther. 2024: doi: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001010; 7: 008-014
  • Germline BRCA1 Mutation inSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Oesophagus: Driver versus Passenger Mutation
    Amrit Kaur Kaler*, Shraddha Manoj Upadhyay, Nandini Shyamali Bora, Ankita Nikam, Kavya P, Nivetha Athikeri, Dattatray B Solanki, Imran Shaikh and Rajesh Mistry Amrit Kaur Kaler*, Shraddha Manoj Upadhyay, Nandini Shyamali Bora, Ankita Nikam, Kavya P, Nivetha Athikeri, Dattatray B Solanki, Imran Shaikh, Rajesh Mistry. Germline BRCA1 Mutation inSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Oesophagus: Driver versus Passenger Mutation. J Genet Med Gene Ther. 2024: doi: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001011; 7: 015-019
  • A Review on Heavy Metals in Ecosystems, Their Sources, Roles, and Impact on Plant Life
    Humaira Aslam, Ali Umar, Misbah Ullah Khan*, Shehla Honey, Aman Ullah, Muhammad Ahsan Ashraf, Ghulam Ayesha, Nazia Nusrat, M Jamil, Shahid Khan and Adeel Abid Humaira Aslam, Ali Umar, Misbah Ullah Khan*, Shehla Honey, Aman Ullah, Muhammad Ahsan Ashraf, Ghulam Ayesha, Nazia Nusrat, M Jamil, Shahid Khan, Adeel Abid. A Review on Heavy Metals in Ecosystems, Their Sources, Roles, and Impact on Plant Life. J Genet Med Gene Ther. 2024: doi: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001012; 7: 020-034
  • Individual Treatment Trial of PIGV-Associated Mabry Syndrome with D-Mannose in a Young Child
    Marta Agnes Somorai*, Annabelle Arlt, Peter Krawitz, Jochen Baumkötter and Volker Mall Marta Agnes Somorai*, Annabelle Arlt, Peter Krawitz, Jochen Baumkötter, Volker Mall. Individual Treatment Trial of PIGV-Associated Mabry Syndrome with D-Mannose in a Young Child. J Genet Med Gene Ther. 2023: doi: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001008; 6: 001-004

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?